Rental market · Anaconda-Deer Lodge County, MT
Anaconda-Deer Lodge County, MT: average rent, home values, and rental yield
Mountain · Population 9,597
Why this market does or does not qualify
Overall City Market Score rank #3,264 of 4,812. The standardized Buy & Hold screen cannot produce a complete result for this city.
Supported strengths
Stability 63/100 and Growth 43/100.
Measured weakness
Cash Flow is the weakest category at 27/100.
Missing screen inputs: investor-entry price estimate. Primary evidenced risk: job growth is the weakest measured factor (7th national percentile).
Data caveat: no missing input is treated as a zero cost. Bring an actual property’s price, rent, taxes, condition, and insurance quote to the calculator.
Why this grade
Overall 41.2 is a weighted geometric mean of the three category scores. Because they are multiplied rather than averaged, their distances from a perfect 100 combine as an exact identity, and each category's share of that distance is the arithmetic below, not an estimate. Cash Flow carries 51% of it, which is what makes it the binding constraint on this grade.
Inside Cash Flow, the shortfall splits over the factors the model scored here, exactly, in proportion to their published weights. The largest component is expense-adjusted yield (weight 22 of the category's 35, 9th national percentile, 79% of the category's own shortfall); next is price to income (weight 13 of the category's 35, 58th national percentile, 21% of the category's own shortfall).
What this is not. It is not a claim that a different value on any one factor would produce a different score or a different grade. Every factor is scored as a national percentile and the grade is a percentile cut against the other 4,812 ranked markets, so this market's position moves only relative to all of them, never on its own. 4 of the 13 factors could not be measured for this market (rent growth, violent crime, property crime, months of supply). Its category renormalizes over the factors that remain: a factor we could not measure is never imputed to fill the gap and never scored as neutral.
How Anaconda-Deer Lodge County ranks nationally
Each row places Anaconda-Deer Lodge County against all 4,812 ranked U.S. markets. The marker is this city; the centre tick is the national median, and the bar spans from that median to the marker, so its length is how far from the middle of the country this market sits and the side it falls on is the direction. Further right is more favorable to an investor: inverted measures (crime, vacancy, price-to-income) are already flipped so higher always means better here.
What a deal looks like here
We can't build a representative buy-box for Anaconda-Deer Lodge County yet: no investor-entry price (Zillow Bottom-Tier ZHVI) could be identity-matched to this market. Rather than fabricate numbers, bring your own price and rent to the calculator.
Open the cash-flow calculator →Price & rent history
Home value: no Zillow ZHVI series - Zillow does not cover this city (Census-only). Nothing plotted rather than estimated.
Asking rent: no Zillow ZORI series - Zillow does not cover this city (Census-only). Nothing plotted rather than estimated.
ZIP markets in Anaconda-Deer Lodge County
5 Census ZIP Codes (ZCTAs) officially overlap Anaconda-Deer Lodge County by land area · 3 data-eligible for subscores. Overlap is Census land-area share, not a population or address share. Each ZIP Code's overall Rental Investor ZIP Score, grade and canonical national rank are shown below (the two component signals, affordability and rental market, are separate percentiles). There is no city-scoped ZIP rank: city overlap isn't a ranking universe, so only the national rank is shown. These ZIP rankings sit in the ZIP universe only, never mixed with, and not directly comparable to, Anaconda-Deer Lodge County's city ranking. Vintage: the Key metric column below is Census ACS 2020–2024 (5-year), the same survey release as the figures used above for Anaconda-Deer Lodge County itself; a city and a ZIP Code are different geographies, so the same measure can still show a different number at each level.
5 of 5 overlapping ZIP Code areas, scoredgrade, overall Rental Investor ZIP Score and national rank for each, on a separate model from this page's city scoreShow table
| ZIP Code | Overallgrade · natl rank | Tier · overlap | Affordabilitysignal · natl rank | Rental marketsignal · natl rank | Key metric |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59756Anaconda-Deer Lodge County | — | ProfilePrimary | — | — | — |
| 59762Anaconda-Deer Lodge County | — | ProfilePrimary | — | — | 3.3%Survey yield |
| 59722Anaconda-Deer Lodge County | C 48#9,773 nat | RankedPrimary | 38#14,786 of 20,132 · bottom 27% | 66#3,209 of 20,132 · top 16% | 3.5%Survey yield |
| 59711Anaconda-Deer Lodge County | C 47#10,159 nat | RankedPrimary | 37#14,907 of 20,132 · bottom 26% | 49#10,057 of 20,132 · top 50% | 3.5%Survey yield |
| 59701Butte-Silver Bow | C 46#11,026 nat | Ranked8.7% overlap | 35#15,911 of 20,132 · bottom 21% | 41#13,522 of 20,132 · bottom 33% | 4.2%Survey yield |
The honest read
Anaconda-Deer Lodge County scores 41/100 overall (grade D): 27 for Cash Flow, 43 for Growth, and 63 for Stability, each a 0–100 score built from the factors in that category. The scenario above shows what a representative investor-entry purchase pencils out to at today's rates. Everything we can measure is in the table below, with its source.
Every factor, shown
The Overall score blends three category scores built from thirteen measured factors: Cash Flow (35%), Growth (35%), and Stability (30%). The table shows every factor; the tag on each percentile marks which category a scored factor feeds. Untagged factors are shown for context but not scored. Every percentile also carries the band it falls in - top 10%, top quartile, above or below the national median, bottom quartile, bottom 10% - so a bare ordinal still reads as a position; the band restates that percentile and adds nothing to it. Every value carries its source and as-of date. How the score works.
| Factor | Value | National percentile | Source · as-of | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense-adjusted yield fallback | 0.9% | Bottom 10%9th percentile · Cash Flow | Census ACS · ACS 5-yr 2020-2024 | Annual rent divided by price, net of a modeled vacancy, tax, capex, and management allowance: the core of the Cash Flow category and what the score is actually computed from. The unadjusted gross yield is shown elsewhere on this page. |
| Price to income fallback | 4.0x | Above median58th percentile · Cash Flow | Census ACS · ACS 5-yr 2020-2024 | Home price over local median income. Lower is cheaper relative to what people earn. Part of the Cash Flow category. |
| Population growth | 0.6%/yr | Above median61st percentile · Growth | Census PEP · Census PEP 2020→2025 (vintage 2025) + Census PEP 2015→2025 (vintages 2019+2025) | Census population trend for the place, capped at 4.5%/yr before scoring (diminishing returns above that rate): the heaviest factor in the Growth category. |
| Job growth | -0.6%/yr (observed -0.3%/yr, capped for scoring) | Bottom 10%7th percentile · Growth | BLS LAUS (county) · BLS LAUS county annual 2019→2025 (pre-COVID anchor; 2025 is an 11-month average) + BLS LAUS county annual 2015→2025 | County employment trend, capped at 4.0%/yr before scoring (diminishing returns above that rate). A Growth-category factor. |
| Income growth | 6.6%/yr | Top quartile75th percentile · Growth | Census ACS · ACS 5-yr 2020-2024 | Local median-income trend. A Growth-category factor. |
| Rent growth | not measured | - | Census ACS · ACS 5-yr 2020-2024 | A 40/60 blend of 3-year and 10-year rent trend (the model's own weighting). A Growth-category factor. |
| Home-value growth fallback | 5.5%/yr | Above median73rd percentile · Growth | Model cohort median (eligible county or state/population cohort); no city-specific observation. Published 2026-10-06 | A 40/60 blend of 3-year and 10-year price trend (the model's own weighting). A small Growth-category factor. |
| Unemployment | 4.0% | Above median56th percentile · Stability | BLS LAUS (county) · BLS LAUS county annual 2025 (11-month average) | County unemployment rate. Lower is steadier, a Stability-category factor. |
| Rental vacancy | 4.0% | Above median65th percentile · Stability | Census ACS B25004 · ACS 5-yr 2020-2024 | Share of rentals empty. Lower means more pricing power. A Stability-category factor. |
| Property tax rate | 0.8% | Above median66th percentile · Stability | Census ACS B25103/B25077 · ACS 5-yr 2020-2024 | Median tax over median value. A direct drag on cash flow, scored in the Stability category as carrying-cost burden. |
| Months of supply | not measured | - | derived | Listings over sales pace. Under about 4 is a seller market, over 6 a buyer market. A Stability-category factor. |
| Days on market | not measured | - | derived | How fast homes sell. Lower means more liquidity and an easier exit. Shown for context, not scored. |
| Sale-to-list ratio | not measured | - | derived | Sale price over asking. Above 100% means homes clear over ask. Shown for context, not scored. |
| Net domestic migration | -2.1/1k | Below median38th percentile | Census PEP (county) · PEP vintage 2025 | Net people moving in or out of the county, per 1,000 residents. Shown for context, not scored. |
| Building permits | 4.9/1k | Top quartile79th percentile | Census BPS (county) · BPS 2025 | New-construction permits per 1,000 homes. More means more supply coming. Shown for context, not scored. |
| Rent burden | 26% | Top quartile82nd percentile | Census ACS B25071 · ACS 5-yr 2020-2024 | Median rent as a share of income. Higher means less headroom for increases. Shown for context, not scored. |
| Median year built | 1954 | Bottom 10%9th percentile | Census ACS B25035 · ACS 5-yr 2020-2024 | Age of the housing stock. Older stock carries more capex. Shown for context, not scored. |
| Max drawdown | not measured | - | derived | Worst peak-to-trough home-value decline on record. Shown for context, not scored. |
| Violent crime | not reported | - | FBI CDE | No agency reported this place to the FBI. We never impute a crime number; where it is missing, the Stability category renormalizes over its remaining factors. |
- † Job growth and unemployment are county-level (BLS LAUS, county FIPS 30023); large multi-county cities inherit their dominant county’s figures.
- Yield uses ACS median gross rent and home value (Census survey data, 2020–2024 average) because Zillow does not cover this city - not directly comparable to Zillow-based yields.
- Data flag: cashYield: ACS fallback (no Zillow rent+value).
- Data flag: rentGrowth: ACS CAGR fallback.
- Data flag: appreciation: ACS CAGR fallback.
Where to go next from Anaconda-Deer Lodge County
Every link below is this market's own data taken one step further: its neighbours in the ranking, the same numbers side by side, or the same numbers in a calculator you can change.
Nearby in the Montana rankings, and national look-alikes
- Kalispell, MTGrade C · score 44/100 · yield 4.1% · $562,374 · #2,863 nationalZillow ZHVI $257k (2009) to $562k (2026), +119%
- Laurel, MTGrade D · score 43/100 · yield 4.2% · $378,211 · #2,960 nationalZillow ZHVI $168k (2009) to $378k (2026), +126%
- Polson, MTGrade D · score 41/100 · yield 3.4% · $578,626 · #3,286 nationalZillow ZHVI $240k (2009) to $579k (2026), +141%
- Bozeman, MTGrade D · score 41/100 · yield 3.6% · $725,769 · #3,341 nationalZillow ZHVI $278k (2009) to $726k (2026), +161%
- San Marcos, CAGrade D · score 41/100 · yield 4.2% · $958,381 · #3,263 nationalZillow ZHVI $235k (2000) to $958k (2026), +308%
- Springfield, MAGrade D · score 41/100 · yield 7.3% · $305,068 · #3,259 nationalZillow ZHVI $87k (2000) to $305k (2026), +250%
- Mesquite, TXGrade D · score 41/100 · yield 6.8% · $258,678 · #3,267 nationalZillow ZHVI $79k (2000) to $259k (2026), +227%
Compare Anaconda-Deer Lodge County head to head
- Anaconda-Deer Lodge County vs Kalispell vs San MarcosThe pre-filled matchup: nearest in-state rank and closest national grade.
- Anaconda-Deer Lodge County vs Laurel, MTGrade D · yield 4.2%
- Anaconda-Deer Lodge County vs Springfield, MAGrade D · yield 7.3%
- Pick your own opponentAny of the 5,233 tracked cities.
Underwrite an Anaconda-Deer Lodge County deal
- Cap rateOpens on Anaconda-Deer Lodge County's own entry price and rent. Change either one.
- Cash flow & DSCRMonthly cash flow and DSCR, prefilled with this market's numbers.
- Mortgage paymentP&I on Anaconda-Deer Lodge County's entry price at the assumptions shown above.
- All marketsCompare Anaconda-Deer Lodge County against 4,812 ranked cities.
- Montana ZIP CodesEvery Montana ZIP Code area (Census ZCTAs), scored separately from the city rankings.
- Ranked listsYield, affordability, growth, stability, price band, or whether rent covers the mortgage.
For learning, not advice. A market screen from public data - not a forecast, not underwriting, not a recommendation to buy anywhere.